IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335037.html

Research on data transaction compliance: A collaborative and co-governance approach considering buyer erroneous feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Fanghao Xiao
  • Xinqing Sun
  • Junxin Shen
  • Wenxia Yi

Abstract

Data transactions are frequently hindered by compliance risks due to participants’ lack of self-regulation and the presence weak regulatory mechanism. To address seller’s non-compliant transaction issues, this study proposes a collaborative governance model that integrates platform audits, government oversight, and buyer supervision. This model considers the heterogeneity of buyer utility and applies evolutionary game theory in a noisy feedback environment. The results indicate that accurate buyer feedback can promote compliance and reduce the supervisory burdens on platforms and governments. The reputation effect can enhance the positive behavior of sellers and platforms but has an “inverted U-shaped” relationship with government regulatory enthusiasm. The government’s subsidy and accountability should avoid a “heavy subsidy and light accountability “and the platform’s reward and punishment mechanism should steer clear of “heavy reward and heavy punishment”. Reducing the benefits of government coordination can also curb “free-riding” behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanghao Xiao & Xinqing Sun & Junxin Shen & Wenxia Yi, 2025. "Research on data transaction compliance: A collaborative and co-governance approach considering buyer erroneous feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335037
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335037&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.