IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do the differences and commonalities in doctoral dissertation acknowledgments across disciplines reveal?

Author

Listed:
  • Kexin Yang
  • Jingwen Han
  • Huibin Zhuang

Abstract

Acknowledgments in academic dissertations occupy a unique role within scholarly communication. Prior research has investigated acknowledgments through lenses such as funding attribution, genre analysis, and linguistic features. This study examines acknowledgments in doctoral dissertations from Chinese universities, organized by broad disciplinary categories. Utilizing BERTopic modeling, the research identifies topic keywords embedded within dissertation acknowledgments. Furthermore, computational linguistics techniques are employed to quantitatively evaluate the content and stylistic attributes of these acknowledgments, complemented by hierarchical clustering analysis to explore cross-disciplinary similarities. The topic modeling results indicate that acknowledgments by Chinese doctoral students frequently convey emotional reflections and exhibit distinct disciplinary traits. Additionally, hierarchical clustering shows that disciplines with similar characteristics exhibit greater similarity in the content and writing style of their acknowledgments, indicating that academic training influences researchers’ writing to some degree. This study seeks to catalyze further scholarly inquiry into this domain, advocating for expanded investigations from perspectives including psychology, neuroscience, and cross-cultural studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kexin Yang & Jingwen Han & Huibin Zhuang, 2025. "What do the differences and commonalities in doctoral dissertation acknowledgments across disciplines reveal?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335035
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335035&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.