Author
Listed:
- Shushu Jiang
- Jiakai Zhang
- Menghao Shi
- Yin Dong
- Zhaohui Wang
- Cheng Wang
Abstract
Introduction: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) shows significant sex differences in disease burden. This study assesses these differences using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 (GBD 2021). Methods: We extracted sex-specific indicators for RHD from the GBD database, including disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), mortality, and prevalence. Trends were analyzed using estimated annual percentage change (EAPC), and sex differences were assessed via female-by-male ratios. Results: From 1990 to 2021, females consistently had higher age-standardized DALYs (ASDR), mortality (ASMR), and prevalence rates (ASPR) than males. These differences were particularly pronounced in specific regions and age groups. In 2021, female ASDR and ASMR in Andorra were over three times higher than males, while in the Cook Islands, they were less than half of males’ rates. In the United States Virgin Islands, females aged 10–19 had an ASMR only 0.01 times that of males, whereas in the United Arab Emirates, females aged 70–89 had ASDR and ASMR five times higher than males. Overall, the female-by-male ratios in ASDR, ASMR, and ASPR have shown a yearly decline. However, these ratios are positively correlated with the Sociodemographic Index (SDI), with correlation coefficients of 0.1 for ASDR, 0.22 for ASMR, and 0.47 for ASPR. Conclusion: Our study reveals a persistent global sex disparity in RHD burden from 1990 to 2021, with females generally experiencing a heavier burden. These findings underscore the need for sex-specific approaches in RHD prevention and treatment and further research into the underlying factors driving these disparities.
Suggested Citation
Shushu Jiang & Jiakai Zhang & Menghao Shi & Yin Dong & Zhaohui Wang & Cheng Wang, 2025.
"Sex difference in the burden of rheumatic heart disease: Insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-13, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0334914
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334914
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.