IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334758.html

Antimicrobial stewardship programs and antibiotic use in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Ammas Siraj Mohammed
  • Dawit Abrham

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant public health crisis, particularly in Africa where infectious disease burdens are high. While antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are a key intervention, a comprehensive synthesis of their impact on antibiotic use in this context is lacking. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the association between ASPs and antibiotic use in Africa. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and regional databases including african journals online and WHO global index medicus will be searched systematically. Original studies of the association of ASPs with antimicrobial consumption across healthcare settings will be included while Animal and environmental studies will be excluded. Two independent reviewers will screen articles, extract data, and assess quality using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. The main outcome measures will be proportion of patients receiving anantibiotic prescription and defined daily doses per 100 patient days. The pooled association of targeted ASPs with antimicrobial consumption will be be measured using multilevel random-effects models. Expected outcomes: This systematic review and meta-analysis is expected to provide valuable, pooled evidence on the effectiveness of ASPs in reducing antimicrobial consumption in Africa. The findings will inform and call for evidence based interventions by governments and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to combat AMR in resource limited settings. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251003018.

Suggested Citation

  • Ammas Siraj Mohammed & Dawit Abrham, 2025. "Antimicrobial stewardship programs and antibiotic use in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334758
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334758&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.