IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) among young adolescents in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mirriam Mkhize
  • Claire van der Westhuizen
  • Katherine Sorsdahl

Abstract

Depression among adolescents is a global concern, including in South Africa, emphasizing the need for reliable screening tools. While the the Patient Health Questionnaire Adolescent (PHQ-A) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) are commonly used mental health screening tools among adolescents, their psychometric properties in South Africa are not well-studied. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the psychometric properties of the PHQ-A and CES-DC among adolescents aged 10–14-year-olds in South Africa. First, a sample of 42 adolescents aged 10–14 years were recruited to participate in cognitive testing focus groups to determine their comprehension of the depression screening tool items. Secondly, a sample of 500 adolescents from 10 schools completed a tablet-based survey including socio-demographic information and the adapted depression screening tools. A subset of 123 adolescents underwent clinical diagnostic interview with the MINI-KID depression modules only. After two weeks, a subset of 145 adolescents had the initial tablet-based survey re-administered for test-retest reliability. Criterion validity was examined using ROC analysis, with the MINI-KID as the reference standard. Of the 500 adolescents surveyed, the majority were female (59.2%), with an average age of 12 years (SD = 1.42). The PHQ-A demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.82) and moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.56). The CES-DC showed good internal consistency (alpha = 0.86) and moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). The PHQ-A displayed good sensitivity (85.7%) and specificity (61.8%). Youden’s index indicated 7.5 as the ideal cutoff score for the PHQ-A. The CES-DC has a sensitivity of 95.2% and specificity of 56.9% and Youden’s index of 21. Factor structure for the PHQ-A included one factor loading for 9 items and 3 factor loading for 8 items; while for the CES-DC factor structure consisted of o three factor loadings. The findings show good psychometric properties of the PHQ-A and CES-DC and contributes to the limited research on mental health assessment tools for younger adolescents in Africa. Testing the psychometric properties of the PHQ-A and CES-DC for this population could help improve early detection and intervention for mental health conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirriam Mkhize & Claire van der Westhuizen & Katherine Sorsdahl, 2025. "Investigating the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) among young adolesce," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334658
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334658
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334658&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334658?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.