IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334653.html

Development and Validation of a Tobacco Testing Laboratories Assessment Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Sonu Goel
  • Chirag Goel
  • Diksha Walia
  • Avinash Sunthlia
  • Leimapokpam Swasticharan
  • Rajendra P Joshi
  • Atul Goel

Abstract

Background: Effective regulation and control of tobacco products require robust laboratory testing capabilities to ensure quality, safety and compliance with relevant standards. Currently, no standardized assessment tool exists globally to evaluate the tobacco testing laboratories. This study aims to address this gap by developing the Tobacco Testing Laboratory Assessment Tool (TTLAT). This tool aligns with the WHO-FCTC on Tobacco Control’s Article 9, which calls for the adoption and implementation of effective testing, measuring, and regulation measures. Methodology: The TTLAT was developed through a systematic literature review and a two-round Delphi technique involving 24 experts. The tool was then validated in four National Tobacco Testing Laboratories in India. Content validity was assessed using the Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI). Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: The final TTLAT comprises 213 items across 11 critical domains including General Information (17), Documents (37), Organization and Management (10), Human Resources (28), Infrastructure (7), Equipment (23), Consumables and Reagents (10), Sample Handling (17), Tobacco Product Analytes (8), Data Management (36), and Biosafety and Biosecurity (20). Content validity analysis showed excellent results. Exploratory factor analysis identified six factors accounting for 52.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good model fit (CFI = 0.91; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.06). The tool showed high internal consistency reliability across factors (Cronbach’s alpha 0.72–0.92). Conclusion: The TTLAT demonstrates strong psychometric properties and provides a comprehensive, standardised approach for assessing tobacco testing laboratory capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonu Goel & Chirag Goel & Diksha Walia & Avinash Sunthlia & Leimapokpam Swasticharan & Rajendra P Joshi & Atul Goel, 2025. "Development and Validation of a Tobacco Testing Laboratories Assessment Tool," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334653
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334653&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.