IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334345.html

Can systematic skewness factors predict future interest rates: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyao Liang
  • Yichen Sun

Abstract

This study uses the numerical changes of the systematic skewness factors to reflect investors’ preferences for the systematic skewness of stocks. As systematic skewness describes the correlation between individual stock returns and market volatility, stocks with positive systematic skewness can obtain positive returns during periods of market volatility. Thus, investors’ preferences for the systematic skewness of stocks can reflect their hedging demands. By examining the predictive power of systematic skewness factors on future interest rates, we found that systematic skewness factors have a significant predictive power on future interest rates. This indicates that investors’ hedging demands influence adjustments to interest rates by China’s monetary authorities. Moreover, for both short‑term and long‑term interest rates, prediction errors based on systematic skewness factors are consistently lower than those from an AR model and the extended Taylor‑rule model proposed by Ma et al. (2025). Systematic skewness can serve as an asymmetric pricing signal in the market for extreme interest rate risks. Its increase often indicates a rise in investors’ anxiety over liquidity tightening, thereby providing central banks with a forward-looking sentiment monitoring window independent of traditional economic indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyao Liang & Yichen Sun, 2026. "Can systematic skewness factors predict future interest rates: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334345
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334345
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334345&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Zhang & Desheng Wei & Zhifeng Liu & Xihao Wu, 2021. "Lottery preference and stock market participation: evidence from China," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 46-62, June.
    2. Jondeau, Eric & Zhang, Qunzi & Zhu, Xiaoneng, 2019. "Average skewness matters," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 29-47.
    3. Jennifer Conrad & Robert F. Dittmar & Eric Ghysels, 2013. "Ex Ante Skewness and Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(1), pages 85-124, February.
    4. Tingting Zhang & Desheng Wei & Zhifeng Liu & Xihao Wu, 2021. "Lottery preference and stock market participation: evidence from China," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 46-62, June.
    5. Bollerslev, Tim & Todorov, Viktor & Xu, Lai, 2015. "Tail risk premia and return predictability," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 113-134.
    6. Haotian Xu & Wei Wei, 2020. "The Market Reaction of Bonus Shares Issuing and the Lottery-like Stock Preference: Evidence from Chinese Stock Market," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5.
    7. Chabi-Yo, Fousseni & Ruenzi, Stefan & Weigert, Florian, 2018. "Crash Sensitivity and the Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 1059-1100, June.
    8. Tingting Zhang & Mengyao Song & Kaixin Li & Zhifeng Liu, 2021. "Lottery preference and stock market return: Chinese evidence using daily and provincial data," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(18), pages 1582-1588, October.
    9. Li An & Huijun Wang & Jian Wang & Jianfeng Yu, 2020. "Lottery-Related Anomalies: The Role of Reference-Dependent Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 473-501, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yakun & Chen, Yan, 2024. "Skewness risk and the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    2. Xianjing Zhou & Tai‐Yong Roh & Yahua Xu, 2025. "Lottery Preference and Skewness Risk Premium: Evidence From the Chinese Market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(10), pages 1818-1851, October.
    3. Ahmed, Walid M.A. & Al Mafrachi, Mustafa, 2021. "Do higher-order realized moments matter for cryptocurrency returns?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 483-499.
    4. Yabei Zhu & Xingguo Luo & Qi Xu, 2023. "Industry variance risk premium, cross‐industry correlation, and expected returns," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 3-32, January.
    5. Jiang, Zhengyun & Zhou, Xin, 2024. "Trading activity, risk aversion, and risk neutral skewness: Evidence from SSE 50ETF option," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 378-399.
    6. José Afonso Faias & Juan Arismendi Zambrano, 2022. "Equity Risk Premium Predictability from Cross-Sectoral Downturns [International asset allocation with regime shifts]," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 808-842.
    7. Jondeau, Eric & Zhang, Qunzi & Zhu, Xiaoneng, 2019. "Average skewness matters," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 29-47.
    8. Masud Alam, 2024. "Volatility in U.S. Housing Sector and the REIT Equity Return," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 505-544, October.
    9. Luo, Di & Mishra, Tapas & Yarovaya, Larisa & Zhang, Zhuang, 2021. "Investing during a Fintech Revolution: Ambiguity and return risk in cryptocurrencies," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Harris, Richard D.F. & Nguyen, Linh H. & Stoja, Evarist, 2019. "Systematic extreme downside risk," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 128-142.
    11. Kingstone Nyakurukwa & Yudhvir Seetharam, 2023. "Higher moment connectedness of cryptocurrencies: a time-frequency approach," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(3), pages 793-814, September.
    12. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Kasinger, Johannes & Schneider, Dmitrij, 2024. "Skewness preferences: Evidence from online poker," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 460-484.
    13. Fracasso, Laís Martins & Müller, Fernanda Maria & Ramos, Henrique Pinto & Righi, Marcelo Brutti, 2023. "Is there a risk premium? Evidence from thirteen measures," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 182-199.
    14. Eric Jondeau & Xuewu Wang & Zhipeng Yan & Qunzi Zhang, 2020. "Skewness and index futures return," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(11), pages 1648-1664, November.
    15. Liu, Bibo & Wang, Huijun & Yu, Jianfeng & Zhao, Shen, 2020. "Time-varying demand for lottery: Speculation ahead of earnings announcements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 789-817.
    16. Dai, Yiming & Jiang, Yuexiang & Long, Huaigang & Wang, Hui & Zaremba, Adam, 2023. "Does realized skewness predict the cross-section of Chinese stock returns?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    17. Xu Chong Bo & Jianlei Han & Yin Liao & Jing Shi & Wu Yan, 2021. "Do outliers matter? The predictive ability of average skewness on market returns using robust skewness measures," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3977-4006, September.
    18. Yigit Atilgan & K. Ozgur Demirtas & A. Doruk Gunaydin & Imra Kirli, 2023. "Average skewness in global equity markets," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 245-271, June.
    19. Asgar Ali & K. N. Badhani, 2023. "Tail risk, beta anomaly, and demand for lottery: what explains cross-sectional variations in equity returns?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 775-804, August.
    20. Stein, Roberto, 2024. "More than meets the eye: On the relationship between skewness and expected returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.