IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334039.html

A randomized trial of grant writing coaching groups: Baseline analysis of early-career scientists’ research background, demographics, and mentorship variables

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Marie Weber-Main
  • Richard McGee
  • Melanie Steiner
  • Jeffrey Engler
  • Harlan P Jones
  • Jessica M Faupel-Badger
  • Alperen Korkmaz
  • Andrew K Langi
  • Patrick O Monahan
  • Kolawole S Okuyemi

Abstract

Introduction: Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in academic career advancement persist in biomedical disciplines. One approach to addressing this problem is systematizing access to mentorship in critical skills such as grant writing. This report summarizes the baseline characteristics of early-career investigators who enrolled in a randomized trial of a group coaching intervention focused on National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant application development. Methods: Surveys assessed participants’ demographic characteristics, research focus, prior publications and grant submissions, self-efficacy for grantsmanship and career advancement, and access to mentorship. Two-sided t-test and Fisher’s exact test were performed to compare baseline variables by gender identity (male/female) and by background from a racial or ethnic population that is an underrepresented minority group in biomedical research (non-URM/URM). Results: The study sample includes 271 faculty and 96 postdoctoral fellows. Sixty-two percent of faculty and 76.0% of postdoctoral fellows identified as female. Nearly half (45.4% of faculty, 49.0% of postdocs) were from URM populations in biomedical research. At baseline, most were conducting clinical and translational research at institutions with high levels of research activity. Past submission of NIH R-series applications was limited; 29.9% of faculty had submitted K applications. On average, participants had moderate levels of self-efficacy (in grantsmanship and career advancement) and research-related mentoring support. Male and non-URM participants had a higher mean number of previous publications. For the remaining variables, there were no or minimal differences by gender identity and URM status. Conclusions: Early-career investigators from diverse backgrounds are motivated to engage in external grant writing coaching programs regardless of existing mentorship and other supports at their home institutions, suggesting that grant coaching can provide complementary value.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Marie Weber-Main & Richard McGee & Melanie Steiner & Jeffrey Engler & Harlan P Jones & Jessica M Faupel-Badger & Alperen Korkmaz & Andrew K Langi & Patrick O Monahan & Kolawole S Okuyemi, 2025. "A randomized trial of grant writing coaching groups: Baseline analysis of early-career scientists’ research background, demographics, and mentorship variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334039
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334039&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.