IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes and costs in specialized burn care: Adapting the Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model for burn care

Author

Listed:
  • Raaba S M Thambithurai
  • Willem H P van Veghel
  • Denise van Uden
  • Jean-Bart Bügel
  • Anouk Pijpe
  • Marianne K Nieuwenhuis
  • Cornelis H van der Vlies
  • Margriet E van Baar
  • Angelique E A M Weel-Koenders
  • on behalf of the National Burn Care, Education & Research group, the Netherlands

Abstract

The Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model supports value-based health care at the institutional level, by calculating disease-specific health outcomes per unit cost over time. The aim of this study was to adapt the QCI model for specialized burn care (the BC-QCI model) and explore its utilization using real-world data. Burn care outcome indicators were selected through an iterative process with multiple stakeholders. Threshold values were established per outcome indicator and average total healthcare costs were calculated. A cohort of adult burn patients (n = 1449) admitted for at least one day and/or had undergone surgery in Dutch burn centers between 2020 and 2023 was used, with a follow-up period of 12 months. The proportion of patients who achieved textbook outcome (i.e., having achieved all the outcome indicators), the average total costs per patient, and QCI values were calculated. Of all patients, 54% achieved all five outcome indicators (i.e., length of stay, wound infections, other complications, discharge destination, and predicted mortality). The most successful outcome indicator was ‘predicted mortality’ (passed by 99% of the population), the least successful outcome indicator was ‘length of stay’ (62%). The patients who failed to achieve one or more outcome indicators (46%) had significantly higher average total costs compared to the patients who achieved textbook outcome (54%) (€50,134 [€47,810-€52,850] vs. €11,721 [€11,096-€12,429]). The BC-QCI model is a solid foundation to provide insights into the outcomes and costs for specialized burn care at the institutional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Raaba S M Thambithurai & Willem H P van Veghel & Denise van Uden & Jean-Bart Bügel & Anouk Pijpe & Marianne K Nieuwenhuis & Cornelis H van der Vlies & Margriet E van Baar & Angelique E A M Weel-Koende, 2025. "Outcomes and costs in specialized burn care: Adapting the Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model for burn care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333660
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333660
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333660&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.