IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333564.html

Implicit processes do not contribute to learning to reach in small mirror reversed visuomotor environments

Author

Listed:
  • Sarvenaz Heirani Moghaddam
  • Erin Krista Cressman
  • Gerome Aleandro Manson

Abstract

Learning to reach with a small visuomotor rotation (VR), where visual feedback regarding hand motion is rotated relative to one’s hand trajectory, has been shown to arise unconsciously (i.e., implicitly). It is unclear whether implicit processes also support learning to reach with a small mirror reversal (MR), where visual feedback regarding hand position is reflected across the body midline. To address this gap, we asked whether implicit processes contribute to learning to reach with a small MR distortion. Forty-two right-handed participants reached to targets located 10° to the left and right of the body midline using a Kinarm exoskeleton robot. Half of the participants experienced a VR distortion (VR participants), in which cursor feedback was rotated 20° clockwise or counterclockwise relative to hand motion. The remaining participants experienced a small MR distortion (MR participants) of a similar magnitude (20°), such that cursor feedback was reflected across the body midline (y-axis). Following reaches with a VR or MR distortion, participants completed assessment trials in which they reached without cursor feedback to assess implicit learning. Analysis of angular errors (AE) revealed that all VR participants learned to reach with the VR distortion, however, only 55% of MR participants learned to reach with the MR distortion (MR-L group). AEs on the no-cursor assessment trials revealed that VR participants engaged in implicit learning. However, there was no evidence of implicit learning in the MR participants, regardless of whether they learned to reach with the MR distortion or not. These findings demonstrate that even when participants learn to reach with small MR distortions, implicit learning processes are not engaged and do not support motor learning. The absence of implicit learning when reaching with a MR distortion compared to a VR distortion suggests that MR and VR learning may be distinct forms of motor learning (e.g., skill acquisition versus motor adaptation respectively).

Suggested Citation

  • Sarvenaz Heirani Moghaddam & Erin Krista Cressman & Gerome Aleandro Manson, 2026. "Implicit processes do not contribute to learning to reach in small mirror reversed visuomotor environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333564
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333564
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333564&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.