IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global trends in the proportion of macrolide-resistant Mycobacterium Species: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Saeid Sadeghi Ghazi Chaki
  • Saeed Babaie Pirsoltan
  • Masoumeh Beig
  • Tahereh Navidifar
  • Elnaz Parvizi
  • Maryam Mofid
  • Narges Golab
  • Mohammad Sholeh

Abstract

Background: Macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium species is an emerging global problem, complicating treating non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Understanding global resistance patterns is essential to improve treatment strategies and reduce morbidity and mortality. Objective: This study aimed to investigate macrolide resistance prevalence, distribution, and trends among Mycobacterium species in different world regions. Methods: A comprehensive search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE (2015–2023) assessed study quality using JBI guidelines. Resistance proportions were calculated with a random-effects model, and additional meta-regression and subgroup analyses explored variations and trends. Statistical analyses were conducted using R and the metafor package. Results: Out of 5,718 records, 41 studies across 17 countries were included. Azithromycin resistance was reported in 17 reports (3 Studies), with 156 resistant isolates among 715 tested, yielding a pooled rate of 29.0% (95% CI: 19.5–40.7%). Clarithromycin resistance, assessed in 76 reports (40 Studies), included 1,071 resistant isolates among 3,923 tested, with a pooled rate of 30.5% (95% CI: 23.7–38.2%). Erythromycin resistance was reported in 17 reports (3 Studies), with 350 resistant isolates among 752 tested, giving a pooled rate of 50.3% (95% CI: 37.5–62.9%). Meta-regression revealed a significant upward trend in azithromycin resistance over time (r = 0.558, p = 0.005). Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for targeted, region- and species-specific interventions to combat rising macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium species effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeid Sadeghi Ghazi Chaki & Saeed Babaie Pirsoltan & Masoumeh Beig & Tahereh Navidifar & Elnaz Parvizi & Maryam Mofid & Narges Golab & Mohammad Sholeh, 2025. "Global trends in the proportion of macrolide-resistant Mycobacterium Species: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333521
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333521
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333521&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.