IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333508.html

EMSA: Explainable multilingual sentiment analysis models providing sentiment analysis across multiple languages

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zhao
  • Jinwei Zhou
  • Jinde Cao
  • Weina Zhu

Abstract

Sentiment analysis across multiple languages remains a challenging problem due to linguistic diversity, domain-specific expressions, and the limited explainability of existing models. This study aims to address these issues by proposing the Explainable Multilingual Sentiment Analyzer (EMSA), a novel framework that integrates large language models with prompt engineering. EMSA employs a two-stage process, first generating sentiment reasoning through chain-of-thought prompts, and then producing sentiment classification with explicit interpretability. We evaluate EMSA on both the GubaSenti dataset (Chinese financial domain) and the SST dataset (English benchmark). Experimental results demonstrate that EMSA consistently outperforms pre-trained language models such as RoBERTa, XLNet, and ALBERT, while providing transparent reasoning steps that enhance user trust. These findings suggest that EMSA not only improves multilingual sentiment classification performance but also contributes to the development of more interpretable and practical sentiment analysis systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Zhao & Jinwei Zhou & Jinde Cao & Weina Zhu, 2025. "EMSA: Explainable multilingual sentiment analysis models providing sentiment analysis across multiple languages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-32, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333508
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333508&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.