IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333494.html

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis retention among men who have sex with men and transgender persons: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Feline de la Court
  • David O T ten Hoff
  • Maria Prins
  • Elske Hoornenborg
  • Maarten F Schim van der Loeff
  • Liza Coyer
  • Anders Boyd

Abstract

Successful implementation of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) requires retention in PrEP care among those with an increased likelihood of HIV. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of retention on PrEP and extent to which variability in PrEP retention is associated with population-, program-, and study-specific characteristics among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender persons (TGP). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining PrEP studies and conference abstracts retrieved from the PubMed and Ovid online databases, capturing demonstration projects or observational studies published from January 1, 2010 to March 24, 2021. We included 84 studies (totaling 90 study “cohorts” analyzed) that reported on the retention of oral PrEP for HIV and included predominantly MSM and TGP. The proportion of retained participants was obtained from each study and used to estimate the cumulative probability of being retained on PrEP and the loss of PrEP retention rate over time via a random-effects meta-analysis survival model. We examined sources of heterogeneity by including study-level covariates in this model. The pooled cumulative probability of PrEP retention was 77.0%, 64.7%, 48.5%, and 24.1% at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Loss of PrEP retention rates were significantly (p

Suggested Citation

  • Feline de la Court & David O T ten Hoff & Maria Prins & Elske Hoornenborg & Maarten F Schim van der Loeff & Liza Coyer & Anders Boyd, 2025. "Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis retention among men who have sex with men and transgender persons: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333494
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333494
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333494&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.