IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models for predicting the risk of bloodstream infections associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Langping Cao
  • Yingxiang Tao
  • Shiqiang Lei
  • Shihua He
  • Yuxuan Peng
  • Sailin Liu
  • Haoran Chen
  • Jin Zhou
  • Yanhui Liu

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) associated bloodstream infections is a type of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), the purpose of this scoping review was to analyse and summarize the risk prediction models for PICC-CLABSI to provide insights for clinical nursing practice. Methods: A scoping review was conducted from six bibliographic databases including CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Journal Database, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception to November 5, 2024. Screening was performed and relevant data was extracted independently by two researchers, the risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, which included two score models, six nomograms, and one ELM model. The included studies exhibited a high risk of bias, mainly due to methodological heterogeneity. Four models underwent external validation, two were assessed for goodness of fit. The most frequently identified predictors including catheter indwelling time, maintenance cycle/frequency, multilumen catheters, PICC parenteral nutrition, diabetes, and malignant tumors. Conclusion: The risk prediction models for PICC-CLABSI demonstrated strong predictive performance. Future research should carefully address all elements of PROBAST framework during study design phase. This will facilitate both internal and external validation, as well as differentiation, calibration, and evaluation of clinical practicality. The ultimate objective is to develop a PICC-CLABSI risk prediction model that exhibits low bias risk, robust predictive performance, and high clinical applicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Langping Cao & Yingxiang Tao & Shiqiang Lei & Shihua He & Yuxuan Peng & Sailin Liu & Haoran Chen & Jin Zhou & Yanhui Liu, 2025. "Models for predicting the risk of bloodstream infections associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333466
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333466&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.