Author
Listed:
- Wentao Yang
- Qian Cheng
- Guoxin Huang
- Hongming Lin
Abstract
Objective: As an emerging insulin resistance marker, the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and frailty needs further exploration. This study examines the eGDR-frailty link, develops a machine learning predictive model to address this gap, and explores diabetes mellitus (DM) as a mediator, providing new insights for clinical intervention. Methods: Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2010 data, we analyzed glucose disposal and frailty associations. Feature selection used LASSO, and class imbalance was handled by SMOTEN. The resampled data were split 7:3 into a training set (n = 29,309) and a test set (n = 12,561).Ten machine learning models were built, with discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility evaluated to identify the optimal model. Confusion matrices visualized performance. Mediation analysis assessed DM’s role in the eGDR-frailty relationship. Results: Among 26,282 participants, eGDR negatively correlated with frailty. Higher eGDR significantly reduced frailty risk in subgroups: women, age ≤ 60, normal/high BMI, never/current smokers, and alcohol users. LASSO selected 12 predictors. Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. Confusion matrices validated classification accuracy. Mediation analysis showed DM partially mediated the eGDR-frailty relationship: indirect effect β=−0.003 (95% CI −0.003 to −0.002; P
Suggested Citation
Wentao Yang & Qian Cheng & Guoxin Huang & Hongming Lin, 2025.
"Estimated glucose disposal rate predicts frailty through diabetes: Evidence from machine learning and mediation models in NHANES,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0333388
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333388
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.