Author
Abstract
Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs) are indispensable in space science, playing critical roles in spacecraft instrumentation, data visualization, and control systems. Selecting reliable suppliers for LCD equipment is vital to ensuring optimal performance and durability in the challenging conditions of outer space. This paper presents a comprehensive decision-making framework using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies tailored for aerospace applications. The framework begins with the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to determine criteria weights such as technical specifications, environmental resistance, quality and reliability, cost and delivery performance, compliance, and certifications. These criteria are crucial for meeting the stringent requirements of space missions and reflect objective metrics and expert opinions. Subsequently, the Complex Proportional Assessment of Alternatives (COPRAS) is applied to rank potential suppliers based on their performance against the weighted criteria. COPRAS allows for a comparative analysis considering positive and negative preferences, ensuring suppliers meet technical specifications and align with strategic mission objectives and constraints. Integrating FAHP and COPRAS enhances supplier selection processes’ transparency, consistency, and objectivity in aerospace procurement. This approach mitigates the risks associated with supplier variability, ensuring continuity in operations critical to space exploration and scientific advancements. The study contributes to advancing decision support systems in aerospace procurement, emphasizing rigorous supplier evaluation methodologies to enhance mission success and reliability in space science applications.
Suggested Citation
Bo-Yu Lin & Hsiaoping Yeh, 2025.
"Computational modeling for enhanced reliability in space missions: An integrated FAHP-COPRAS approach to supplier selection,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-14, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0333310
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333310
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.