IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional vision in daily life: Clinical and patient-reported outcomes 18 months after enhanced partial range of field IOL implantation

Author

Listed:
  • Catharina Latz
  • Annika Licht
  • Katharina A Ponto
  • Johannes Menzel-Severing
  • David P Piñero
  • Alireza Mirshahi

Abstract

Background: Partial range of field (PROF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) provide good distance visual acuity with enhanced intermediate visual acuity. Neuroadaptation to new intraocular lenses can take several months. This study investigates visual and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in patients implanted with the PROF IOL ICB00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision) 18 months post-surgery. A particular focus was put on spectacle independence while performing activities of daily life. Methods: This ambispective, single-center study included 41 patients (aged 48–84). Visual acuities (distance, intermediate), refraction, and PROMs were assessed ≥18 months post-surgery. Spectacle independence was evaluated using the PRSIQ questionnaire. Patients also self-reported on visual quality, task performance, and photic phenomena. Results: Binocular visual acuity of 0.20 logMAR or better was achieved by 100.0% of patients for uncorrected or corrected distance, by 73.2% for uncorrected intermediate, and by 79.5% for distance-corrected intermediate vision. Photic phenomena were reported by

Suggested Citation

  • Catharina Latz & Annika Licht & Katharina A Ponto & Johannes Menzel-Severing & David P Piñero & Alireza Mirshahi, 2025. "Functional vision in daily life: Clinical and patient-reported outcomes 18 months after enhanced partial range of field IOL implantation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333174
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333174
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333174&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.