IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agent-based persuasion model with concessions dependent on emotion and time beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Jinghua Wu
  • Ruiyang Cao
  • Ya Zhang
  • Yan Li

Abstract

Automated negotiation agents require human-like adaptability in emotionally charged and time-constrained settings. This study introduces an Emotion-Time Dual-Process Framework that integrates the Appraisal Tendency Framework with dynamic temporal modeling. Emotions are decomposed into pleasantness and certainty dimensions and mapped to six emotional persuasion strategies. A variable-rate time function is designed to capture the perceptions of dynamic time pressure. Emotion and time pressure jointly drive a state-dependent concession updating model. The proposed framework was validated through a series of simulation experiments based on different scenarios. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework has significant advantages in improving negotiation success rates, joint utility, and outcome fairness against baseline models. In particular, incorporating emotional factors reduces utility disparity between parties by 28.55%, while the proposed time function improves negotiation efficiency by 12.99% without sacrificing fairness or the success rate. This study provides a theorical basis for developing highly more human-like and adaptive intelligent negotiation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinghua Wu & Ruiyang Cao & Ya Zhang & Yan Li, 2025. "Agent-based persuasion model with concessions dependent on emotion and time beliefs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-39, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333078
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333078
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333078&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.