IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0333042.html

Opening up? Exploring motives and needs of students and staff of a Dutch university on disclosing mental health issues to inform decision aid development

Author

Listed:
  • Yil Engbersen-Severijns
  • Daniëlle N Zijlstra
  • Sanne E M Brouwers
  • Femke M den Uil
  • Véronique Vancauwenbergh
  • Thomas Gültzow

Abstract

Background: Decisions about disclosing mental health issues can be difficult, especially in the university setting. For this reason, students and staff of universities might benefit from decision support tools, such as the use of a decision aid. Currently, little is known about if and how people in this setting disclose and how decision support should look like. This study aims to address this gap by exploring disclosure experiences and preferences for support. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff (n = 10) and students (n = 10), including participants who decided to (not) disclose their mental health condition. The participants were asked to complete a short questionnaire. Subsequently, they were interviewed about the decision to disclose and their needs regarding a potential disclosure decision aid. Interviews were analyzed using the Framework method. Results: Most students chose not to disclose, whereas most staff did. Students and staff described advantages and disadvantages of disclosing. Reported advantages included support, relief, understanding, and safety. Risks included (fear of) stigmatization and career concerns. Not disclosing can prevent unwanted questions but can also lead to misunderstandings. Regarding decision support, both students and staff preferred a brief online tool. Conclusion: In conclusion, both students and staff encounter challenges when it comes to deciding whether to disclose their mental health status. A decision aid can be a valuable tool to support them in making their decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Yil Engbersen-Severijns & Daniëlle N Zijlstra & Sanne E M Brouwers & Femke M den Uil & Véronique Vancauwenbergh & Thomas Gültzow, 2025. "Opening up? Exploring motives and needs of students and staff of a Dutch university on disclosing mental health issues to inform decision aid development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333042
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333042
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0333042&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0333042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawn Stacey & France Légaré & Laura Boland & Krystina B. Lewis & Marie-Chantal Loiselle & Lauren Hoefel & Mirjam Garvelink & Annette O’Connor, 2020. "20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(3), pages 379-398, April.
    2. Mirjam M. Garvelink & Laura Boland & Krystal Klein & Don Vu Nguyen & Matthew Menear & Hilary L. Bekker & Karen B. Eden & Annie LeBlanc & Annette M. O’Connor & Dawn Stacey & France Légaré, 2019. "Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(4), pages 301-314, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yueh-Ling Liao & Tsae-Jyy Wang & Chien-Wei Su & Shu-Yuan Liang & Chieh-Yu Liu & Jun-Yu Fan, 2023. "Efficacy of a Decision Support Intervention on Decisional Conflict Related to Hepatocellular Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(1), pages 233-243, January.
    2. Yulia Gendler & Ayala Blau, 2024. "Exploring Cultural and Religious Effects on HPV Vaccination Decision Making Using a Web-Based Decision Aid: A Quasi-experimental Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 44(4), pages 426-436, May.
    3. Anne Christin Rahn & Janet Jull & Laura Boland & Jeanette Finderup & Marie-Chantal Loiselle & Maureen Smith & Sascha Köpke & Dawn Stacey, 2021. "Guidance and/or Decision Coaching with Patient Decision Aids: Scoping Reviews to Inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS)," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(7), pages 938-953, October.
    4. Mirjam M. Garvelink & Laura Boland & Krystal Klein & Don Vu Nguyen & Matthew Menear & Hilary L. Bekker & Karen B. Eden & Annie LeBlanc & Annette M. O’Connor & Dawn Stacey & France Légaré, 2019. "Decisional Conflict Scale Findings among Patients and Surrogates Making Health Decisions: Part II of an Anniversary Review," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(4), pages 316-327, May.
    5. Alexandre Dumont & Myriam de Loenzien & Hung Mac Quo Nhu & Marylène Dugas & Charles Kabore & Pisake Lumbiganon & Maria Regina Torloni & Celina Gialdini & Guillermo Carroli & Claudia Hanson & Ana Pilar, 2022. "Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Holly O. Witteman & Kristin G. Maki & Gratianne Vaisson & Jeanette Finderup & Krystina B. Lewis & Karina Dahl Steffensen & Caroline Beaudoin & Sandrine Comeau & Robert J. Volk, 2021. "Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(7), pages 736-754, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0333042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.