Author
Listed:
- Katherine East
- Harry Tattan-Birch
- Eve Taylor
Abstract
Introduction: Use of nicotine pouches is rising but little independent data exist on the types of pouches used by UK adults. This study therefore assesses: (1) demographic characteristics associated with using nicotine pouches; (2) nicotine content, flavours, brands, and frequency of use of nicotine pouches. Methods: Online cross-sectional Qualtrics survey of N = 2,967 UK adults (≥18 years) conducted May/June 2024. The sample were drawn from Prolific Academic using quotas (age, biological sex, ethnicity). Measures included demographics, vaping status, smoking status, frequency of nicotine pouch use, and pouch brand, flavour, and nicotine content used most often. Results: Overall, 2.9% (n = 85) currently used, and an additional 10.1% (n = 299) had tried, pouches. Ever use declined with age and was most common among males (AOR = 1.80, 95%CI = 1.40–3.31) and those who currently vaped (AOR = 7.19, 4.80–10.75) or smoked (AOR = 5.80, 3.82–8.80). Nicotine pouch use was rare among adults who never smoked (3.0%) or never vaped (2.7%). Among adults who had ever used nicotine pouches (n = 384), half used Nordic Spirit (49.7%), most used mint/menthol flavours (60.7%), the most popular nicotine content was 11–20 mg (34.6%) although many did not know the nicotine content (28.4%), and around a fifth (19.5%) reported using them every day, with an additional fifth (21.9%) a few times a week, and a quarter tried once or twice (25.5%). Conclusions: Among UK adults, nicotine pouches were predominantly used by those who currently/formerly smoke or vape and were also most popular among males and younger adults. Mint/menthol and 11–20 mg pouches were most popular and use frequency patterns varied substantially.
Suggested Citation
Katherine East & Harry Tattan-Birch & Eve Taylor, 2025.
"What are the characteristics of people who use nicotine pouches and what types of pouches are being used? Data from an online cross-sectional survey of UK adults,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-7, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0332962
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332962
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.