IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local US officials’ views on the impacts and governance of AI: Evidence from 2022 and 2023 survey waves

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Hatz
  • Noemi Dreksler
  • Kevin Wei
  • Baobao Zhang

Abstract

This paper presents a survey of local US policymakers’ views on the future impact and regulation of AI. Our survey provides insight into US policymakers’ expectations regarding the effects of AI on local communities and the nation, as well as their attitudes towards specific regulatory policies. Conducted in two waves (2022 and 2023), the survey captures attitudinal changes within the six months following the public release of ChatGPT and the subsequent surge in public awareness of AI. Local policymakers express a mix of concern, optimism, and uncertainty about AI’s impacts, anticipating significant societal risks such as increased surveillance, misinformation, and political polarization, alongside potential benefits in innovation and infrastructure. Many also report feeling underprepared and inadequately informed to make AI-related decisions. On regulation, a majority of policymakers support government oversight and favor specific policies addressing issues such as data privacy, AI-related unemployment, and AI safety and fairness. Democrats show stronger and more consistent support for regulation than Republicans, but the latter experienced a notable shift towards majority support between 2022 and 2023. Our study contributes to understanding the perspectives of local policymakers—key players in shaping state and federal AI legislation—by capturing evolving attitudes, partisan dynamics, and their implications for policy formation. The findings highlight the need for capacity-building initiatives and bi-partisan coordination to mitigate policy fragmentation and build a cohesive framework for AI governance in the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Hatz & Noemi Dreksler & Kevin Wei & Baobao Zhang, 2025. "Local US officials’ views on the impacts and governance of AI: Evidence from 2022 and 2023 survey waves," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332919
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332919&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.