IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel risk score model for predicting mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the CURE-HF Registry–ApHAC score

Author

Listed:
  • Takenori Aoki
  • Sho Suzuki
  • Masatoshi Minamisawa
  • Koji Yoshie
  • Ken Nishikawa
  • Yukari Okuma
  • Kazuhiro Kimura
  • Yasushi Ueki
  • Yasutaka Oguchi
  • Tamon Kato
  • Tatsuya Saigusa
  • Soichiro Ebisawa
  • Ayako Okada
  • Hirohiko Motoki
  • Koichiro Kuwahara

Abstract

Aims: To create a simple risk score model to predict post-discharge mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) after treatment for acute decompensated heart failure (HF). Methods and results: This was a post-hoc analysis from the CURE-HF registry, which was a prospective multi-center cohort study conducted in Japan between July 2014 and March 2019. We included 378 consecutive patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) who were followed for two years. The total cohort was randomly divided into two cohorts: the derivation (n = 278) and the validation (n = 100) cohort. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within two years. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between covariates and the primary endpoint, and to produce the risk score model. C-statistics were calculated to assess the discriminative ability of the derived model. The median age was 83 years, and 52% of the patients were female. In total, 97 patients died within two years. No significant differences were observed between the derivation and validation cohorts in baseline characteristics. On multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise variable selection, the following variables were selected as the components of the risk score model: age, prior HF admission, serum albumin, and creatinine. The model enabled stratification of mortality rates across thirds, and the average predicted versus observed probabilities of death for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 8% vs. 9%, 23% vs. 21%, and 46% vs. 49%, respectively. The c-statistic of the derived model in the validation cohorts was 0.764, indicating a good discrimination of the primary endpoint. Conclusions: We developed a simple risk score model for predicting two-year mortality in patients with HFpEF. This score model may be useful in guiding decisions regarding close follow-up, advanced therapies, or palliative care for these patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Takenori Aoki & Sho Suzuki & Masatoshi Minamisawa & Koji Yoshie & Ken Nishikawa & Yukari Okuma & Kazuhiro Kimura & Yasushi Ueki & Yasutaka Oguchi & Tamon Kato & Tatsuya Saigusa & Soichiro Ebisawa & Ay, 2025. "A novel risk score model for predicting mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the CURE-HF Registry–ApHAC score," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332913
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332913
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332913&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.