Author
Listed:
- James R John
- Teresa Winata
- Si Wang
- Melissa Smead
- Weng Tong Wu
- Jane Kohlhoff
- Virginia Schmied
- Bin Jalaludin
- Kenny Lawson
- Siaw-Teng Liaw
- Raghu Lingam
- Andrew Page
- Christa Lam-Cassettari
- Katherine Boydell
- Ping-I Lin
- Ilan Katz
- Ann Dadich
- Shanti Raman
- Rebekah Grace
- Aunty Kerrie Doyle
- Tom McClean
- Blaise Di Mento
- John Preddy
- Susan Woolfenden
- Valsamma Eapen
Abstract
Background: Digital screening and navigation interventions are increasingly integrated into health systems to identify and support families’ unmet social care needs, yet their effectiveness in improving outcomes remains unclear among priority population communities. We hypothesise that responses to such digital interventions might vary based on sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics. Methods: Data were analysed from 288 participants in a randomised controlled trial evaluating Watch Me Grow-Electronic – a digital screening and service navigation model to identify psychosocial needs, parental wellbeing, and child developmental needs in South Western Sydney (urban site) and Murrumbidgee (regional/rural site), New South Wales, Australia. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of families based on parental and child clinical and sociodemographic factors. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression was conducted to assess changes in unmet needs, stratified by class and intervention group. Results: Three distinct classes were identified. Class 1 (n = 134) included people who were entirely non-culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background, in good mental health, with higher education and socioeconomic status (SES), and from the regional/rural site. Class 2 (n = 94) included people who were predominantly non-CALD, of low education and SES, had poor mental health, and from the regional/rural site. Class 3 (n = 56) included people of CALD, high SES and education, and good mental health, who were from the urban site. Compared to the Class 3, participants in Class 2 showed significantly higher needs, indicating that the intervention was not effective in this vulnerable group. Discussion: Digital navigation tools might support families that experience lower psychosocial adversity but are insufficient for families that experience higher levels of adversity, highlighting the need for tiered approaches to ensure equity.
Suggested Citation
James R John & Teresa Winata & Si Wang & Melissa Smead & Weng Tong Wu & Jane Kohlhoff & Virginia Schmied & Bin Jalaludin & Kenny Lawson & Siaw-Teng Liaw & Raghu Lingam & Andrew Page & Christa Lam-Cass, 2026.
"Identifying subgroups with differential levels of service response to a digital screening and service navigation program for unmet social care needs,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0332790
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332790
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.