IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332725.html

A multi-period robust portfolio optimization framework using yager’s entropy

Author

Listed:
  • Arman Khosravi
  • Seyed Jafar Sadjadi

Abstract

Modern portfolio theory, while foundational, struggles with extreme sensitivity to input parameters and a tendency to select highly concentrated portfolios, often leading to out-of-sample underperformance. This research addresses these critical gaps by introducing the Generalized Robust Mean-Variance-Entropy (GRMVE) framework, a novel Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) model designed for adaptive, multi-period investment settings. The GRMVE framework integrates budgeted uncertainty to mitigate the risk of estimation errors in expected returns, while simultaneously incorporating Yager’s entropy to mathematically enforce structural diversification and prevent over-concentration. The framework is empirically validated using a dynamic, expanding-window re-optimization approach over a 72-month horizon on a pre-selected universe of 60 assets spanning all 11 sectors of the S&P 500. Out-of-sample results demonstrate that the GRMVE framework achieves highly competitive risk-adjusted returns compared to the famously resilient Naive (1/n) strategy and the state-of-the-art Mean-CVaR model. Crucially, it overcomes the severe portfolio concentration and prohibitive trading turnover associated with scenario-based tail-risk models (CVaR) and the extreme instability of non-robust mean-variance models. By successfully navigating severe market downturns and volatile recoveries with significantly lower drawdowns, the findings highlight the GRMVE framework as a highly practical, computationally tractable, and structurally resilient solution for institutional portfolio management.

Suggested Citation

  • Arman Khosravi & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi, 2026. "A multi-period robust portfolio optimization framework using yager’s entropy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-30, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332725
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332725
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332725&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiou, Wan-Jiun Paul & Lee, Alice C. & Chang, Chiu-Chi A., 2009. "Do investors still benefit from international diversification with investment constraints?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 448-483, May.
    2. Anil Bera & Sung Park, 2008. "Optimal Portfolio Diversification Using the Maximum Entropy Principle," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4-6), pages 484-512.
    3. Campbell, John Y. & Viceira, Luis M., 2002. "Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296942.
    4. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    5. A. L. Soyster, 1973. "Technical Note—Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1154-1157, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Y. Campbell & Luis M. Viceira & Joshua S. White, 2003. "Foreign Currency for Long-Term Investors," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Miao, Jianjun & Wang, Neng, 2007. "Investment, consumption, and hedging under incomplete markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 608-642, December.
    3. Pelizzon, Loriana & Weber, Guglielmo, 2009. "Efficient portfolios when housing needs change over the life cycle," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2110-2121, November.
    4. repec:idb:brikps:365 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Schwartz, Eduardo S & Tebaldi, Claudio, 2004. "Illiquid Assets and Optimal Portfolio Choice," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt7q65t12x, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    6. Lin, Wen-chang & Lu, Jin-ray, 2012. "Risky asset allocation and consumption rule in the presence of background risk and insurance markets," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 150-158.
    7. Klos, Alexander, 2004. "The investment horizon and dynamic asset allocation--some experimental evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 167-170, November.
    8. Paolo BATTOCCHIO, 2002. "Optimal Portfolio Strategies with Stochastic Wage Income : The Case of A defined Contribution Pension Plan," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2002005, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    9. Christoph Breunig & Steffen Huck & Tobias Schmidt & Georg Weizsäcker, 2021. "The Standard Portfolio Choice Problem in Germany," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2413-2446.
    10. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    11. Kolm, Petter N. & Tütüncü, Reha & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 356-371.
    12. Penaranda, Francisco, 2007. "Portfolio choice beyond the traditional approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Luo, Yulei, 2014. "Strategic Consumption-Portfolio Rules and Precautionary Savings with Informational Frictions," MPRA Paper 58077, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Andreas Fagereng & Charles Gottlieb & Luigi Guiso, 2017. "Asset Market Participation and Portfolio Choice over the Life-Cycle," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 705-750, April.
    15. George-Marios Angeletos, 2005. "Uninsured Idiosyncratic Investment Risk," NBER Working Papers 11180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Bart Dees & Theo Nijman & Arthur Soest, 2023. "Stated Product Choices of Heterogeneous Agents are Largely Consistent with Standard Models," De Economist, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 267-302, September.
    17. Luc Arrondel & Frédérique Savignac, 2009. "Stockholding: Does housing wealth matter?," Working papers 266, Banque de France.
    18. Rytchkov, Oleg, 2016. "Time-Varying Margin Requirements and Optimal Portfolio Choice," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 655-683, April.
    19. Jimmy E. Hilliard & Jitka Hilliard, 2018. "Rebalancing versus buy and hold: theory, simulation and empirical analysis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-32, January.
    20. Alexis Direr, 2023. "Portfolio Choice With Time Horizon Risk," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(06n07), pages 1-19, November.
    21. Alistair Macaulay & Chenchuan Shi, 2026. "Ambiguity Aversion, Portfolio Choice, and Life Expectancy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 67(2), pages 633-655, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.