IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient demographics, medical factors, treatment modalities and satisfaction at five traditional Chinese medicine practices in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Yingchao Liu
  • Xiaoying Lyu
  • Saroj K Pradhan
  • Yiming Li
  • Xingfang Liu
  • Ralf Bauder
  • Tanja Heggli
  • Xiaying Wang
  • Michael Furian

Abstract

Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and insurance systems, therefore, it is essential to understand its current status and patients’ perspectives. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1st to December 31st, 2023, across five TCM practices in Switzerland. All patients attending their sixth therapy session were invited to complete an electronically anonymized questionnaire covering patient demographics, treatment experiences, and satisfaction. Results: A total of 461 patients participated in the survey, with the majority being female (60.1%) and aged 50 years or older (57.4%). Among them, 54.0% reported multiple health conditions, with 32.9% having musculoskeletal disorders and 31.8% suffering from chronic pain as the main reasons for seeking therapy. Most patients received weekly TCM treatments (91.3%), with 50.7% also undergoing conventional therapies. Of the respondents, 50.0% reported full coverage for their TCM therapy costs. Access to TCM was primarily through personal recommendations (44.5%), and 92.2% of patients reported waiting less than 10 minutes before each therapy session. Acupuncture was the predominant treatment (95.7%), with 35.8% receiving additional dietary advice. The overall patient satisfaction rate stood at 96.5%, with 99.5% indicating their intention to continue receiving TCM treatments. Notably, patients with full insurance coverage for TCM treatment costs demonstrated significantly higher treatment satisfaction compared to those with no coverage (odds ratio = 2.42, 95% confidence interval [1.10 to 5.31], p = 0.028). By contrast, other evaluated medical factors did not show statistically significant associations with treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: This study revealed that women, patients aged over 50, and individuals with multiple health conditions, particularly musculoskeletal disorders and chronic pain, are more likely to seek regular integrated TCM treatment. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with TCM, with treatment satisfaction significantly higher among those with full insurance coverage for TCM treatment costs compared to those without coverage. Future research should enroll a broader range of TCM practices and patient populations to enhance the generalizability of these findings and accurately evaluate how insurance coverage influences TCM satisfaction, thereby better addressing patient needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingchao Liu & Xiaoying Lyu & Saroj K Pradhan & Yiming Li & Xingfang Liu & Ralf Bauder & Tanja Heggli & Xiaying Wang & Michael Furian, 2025. "Patient demographics, medical factors, treatment modalities and satisfaction at five traditional Chinese medicine practices in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332586
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332586
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332586&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.