Author
Listed:
- Anthony G Vaccaro
- Shruti Shakthivel
- Helen Wu
- Rishab Iyer
- Jonas Kaplan
Abstract
Ambivalence and uncertainty, though related, are distinct constructs. While research has explored the link between certainty judgements and ambivalence in the context of attitudes and beliefs, little is known about individual differences in how certain people feel about identifying their own ambivalent, or mixed, emotions in the moment. In two samples, we investigated the relationship between the intensity of mixed emotions and self-reported certainty of one’s own current affective experience on a trial-to-trial basis. We additionally tested whether this relationship was moderated by personality and emotional traits. First, in a sample of 140 participants, we found a significant negative relationship between the intensity of mixed feelings and affective certainty, and this relationship was weaker in those with higher emotional intelligence. We next conducted a pre-registered online study with 311 participants in a sample more demographically representative of the United States. We replicated our finding that uncertainty was predicted by higher intensity of co-occurring positive and negative affect, but did not replicate the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Trait meta-mood, however, did moderate this relationship. Our results show that despite the abstract nature of asking people to report how certain they are of how they feel, and potentially differing interpretations of the question, meaningful variation is found in responses. Future work can refine methods of gauging affective uncertainty, and the implication of affective certainty for mixed emotions on well-being.
Suggested Citation
Anthony G Vaccaro & Shruti Shakthivel & Helen Wu & Rishab Iyer & Jonas Kaplan, 2025.
"Individual differences in feelings of certainty surrounding mixed emotions,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-20, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0332417
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332417
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.