IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lightweight deep models based on domain adaptation and network pruning for breast cancer HER2 scoring: IHC vs. H&E histopathological images

Author

Listed:
  • Lamiaa Abdel-Hamid
  • Pratheepan Yogarajah
  • Safy Hosny Ahmed Tealab

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is an aggressive cancer type that requires special diagnosis and treatment methods. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining effectively highlights relevant morphological structures within histopathological images yet can be expensive in terms of both labor and required laboratory equipment. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images are more readily available and less expensive than IHC images as they are routinely performed for all patient samples. Lightweight models are well-suited for deployment on resource-constrained devices such as mobile phones and embedded systems, making them ideal for real-time diagnosis in rural regions and developing countries. In this study, IHC images are compared to H&E images for automatic HER2 scoring using lightweight deep models that incorporate several advanced techniques including network pruning, domain adaptation, and attention mechanisms. Two lightweight models are presented: PrunEff4 and ATHER2. PrunEff4 is a subset of EfficientNetV2B0 pruned to reduce the network parameters by ~80%. ATHER2 is a customized lightweight network that employs different sized convolutional filters along with a convolutional block attention module (CBAM). For PrunEff4 and ATHER2, transfer learning (pretraining on ImageNet) and domain-specific pretraining were employed, respectively. Different datasets were utilized in the development and final testing phases in order to effectively evaluate their generalization capability. In all experiments, both networks resulted in accuracies ranging from 97% to 100% for binary classifications and from 95.5% to 98.5% for multiclass classifications regardless of whether IHC or H&E images were utilized. Network pruning significantly reduced the network parameters whilst maintaining reliable performance. Domain-specific pretraining significantly enhanced performance, particularly in complex classification tasks such as HER2 scoring using H&E images and multiclass classifications. Both IHC and H&E stained images were suitable for deep learning-based HER2 scoring, given that the deep networks are efficiently trained for the specified task.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamiaa Abdel-Hamid & Pratheepan Yogarajah & Safy Hosny Ahmed Tealab, 2025. "Lightweight deep models based on domain adaptation and network pruning for breast cancer HER2 scoring: IHC vs. H&E histopathological images," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332362
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332362&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.