IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal protozoal infections among patients in Malaysia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nor Shazlina Mizan
  • Seok Mui Wang
  • Hasnah Ma'amor
  • Hassanain Al-Talib

Abstract

Backgrounds: Intestinal protozoan infections (IPI), including Entamoeba spp., Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp., are common in diarrhoea patients in Malaysia. These parasites are primarily transmitted through contaminated food and water sources and pose a significant public health concern. Entamoeba spp., causes amoebiasis, which is characterised by severe diarrhoea with bloody stools, while Giardia spp., causes giardiasis, which is characterised by watery diarrhoea, abdominal pain and flatulence. Cryptosporidium spp. causes cryptosporidiosis, which is particularly severe in immunocompromised individuals. Despite efforts to improve water quality, sanitation, hygiene, and surveillance, limited epidemiological data prevent a clear understanding of the prevalence of intestinal protozoa and response to treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate prevalence, identify risk factors, and evaluate detection methods. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out in the following databases: Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidance. Based on the random effects model, results were reported as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were performed based on detection methods, target populations and regions. Results: A total of 103 articles were found on the prevalence and risk factors of IPI in Malaysia. After removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 49 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of IPI in Malaysia was 24% (95% CI: 0.17.0, 0.29). with I2 = 98.94%, (P 98%), reflecting substantial variability across the included studies. Conclusion: This review provides valuable insights into the epidemiology of protozoal intestinal infections in Malaysia. The high pooled prevalence of 24% underscores a substantial and ongoing burden of intestinal protozoal infections in Malaysia. The pooled prevalence should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity, as the findings may not be generalizable to all settings. These findings support the development of evidence-based interventions to reduce the impact of these infections. Targeted screening, improved diagnostics, better access to clean water and sanitation, and health education for vulnerable groups are essential to reduce the burden of intestinal protozoa and strengthen national control measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Nor Shazlina Mizan & Seok Mui Wang & Hasnah Ma'amor & Hassanain Al-Talib, 2025. "Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal protozoal infections among patients in Malaysia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332218
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332218
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332218&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.