IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A volumetric modulated arc therapy-based dynamic conformal arc technique with limited monitor units (VMATliMU) to reduce multileaf collimator interplay effects: A computational phantom study for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Min Jung
  • Yong Jae Kwon
  • Yong Wan Cho
  • Jong Geol Baek
  • Dong Jae Jang
  • Yongdo Yun
  • Seok-Ho Lee
  • Gahee Son
  • Hyunjong Yoo
  • Min Cheol Han
  • Jin Sung Kim

Abstract

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer involves complex multileaf collimator (MLC) motion, which increases sensitivity to interplay effects with tumour motion. Current dynamic conformal arc methods address this issue but may limit the achievable dose distribution optimisation compared with standard VMAT. This study examined the clinical utility of a VMAT technique with monitor unit limits (VMATliMU) to mimic conformal arc delivery and reduce interplay effects while maintaining plan quality. VMATliMU was implemented by applying monitor unit limitations during VMAT reoptimisation to minimise MLC encroachment into target volumes. Using mesh-type reference computational phantom CT images, treatment plans were generated for a simulated stage I lung cancer case prescribed to 45 Gy in three fractions. VMATliMU, conventional VMAT, VMAT with leaf speed limitations, dynamic conformal arc therapy, and constant dynamic conformal arc therapy were compared. Plans were optimised for multiple isodose line prescriptions (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90%) to investigate the impact of dose distribution. Evaluation parameters included MLC positional accuracy using area difference ratios, dosimetric indices, gradient metrics, and organ-at-risk doses. VMATliMU prevented MLC encroachment into the internal target volume across 60%–90% isodose lines, showing superior MLC accuracy compared with other methods. At the challenging 50% isodose line, VMATliMU had 4.5 times less intrusion than VMAT with leaf speed limits. VMAT plans had better dosimetric indices than dynamic conformal arc plans. VMATliMU reduced monitor units by 5.1%–19.2% across prescriptions. All plans met the clinical dose constraints, with the aortic arch below tolerance and acceptable lung doses. VMATliMU combines VMAT’s dosimetric benefits with the dynamic conformal arcs’s simplicity, minimising MLC encroachment while maintaining plan quality. Reduced monitor units lower low-dose exposure, treatment time, and interplay effects. VMATliMU is usable in existing planners with monitor unit limits, offering a practical solution for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Min Jung & Yong Jae Kwon & Yong Wan Cho & Jong Geol Baek & Dong Jae Jang & Yongdo Yun & Seok-Ho Lee & Gahee Son & Hyunjong Yoo & Min Cheol Han & Jin Sung Kim, 2025. "A volumetric modulated arc therapy-based dynamic conformal arc technique with limited monitor units (VMATliMU) to reduce multileaf collimator interplay effects: A computational phantom study for stage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332190
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332190
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332190&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.