IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331880.html

Does electronic invoicing lead to stronger tax compliance? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruicui Tao
  • Jiakun Li

Abstract

This article investigates whether China’s fully digitalized electronic invoicing reform has improved tax compliance, using a staggered difference-in-differences approach. The results show that: (1) The e-invoicing reform has significantly improved firms’ effective tax rate by 0.91 percentage points on average. This finding remains robust after controlling for firm-level and regional confounders and across a range of robustness checks, including alternative measures of tax compliance and alternative clustering of standard errors. (2) Mechanism analyses indicate that the reform reshapes firms’ reporting behavior on both the revenue and cost sides of the production process. Firms adjust reported revenues and reported costs jointly, with a stronger contraction in reported costs than in reported revenues, leading to an overall reduction in tax evasion. (3) Heterogeneity analyses reveal that the compliance-enhancing effect of the reform is more pronounced among non-state-owned enterprises, firms operating outside key industries under intense tax authority scrutiny, and those located in regions with lower tax enforcement capacity. This study provides micro-level evidence on the effectiveness of digital tax reforms and offers practical implications for tax governance policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruicui Tao & Jiakun Li, 2026. "Does electronic invoicing lead to stronger tax compliance? Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331880
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331880
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331880&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.