IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Lan Yang

Abstract

Modern enterprises grapple with complex financial data and multidimensional risk interdependencies in their operations. Machine learning offers transformative potential for tax risk assessment and smart auditing solutions. This research analyzes 3,232 tax records from regional manufacturing and service sectors (2021–2023) to evaluate three predictive models: SVM, XGBoost, and Random Forest. Results demonstrate Random Forest’s superior performance, achieving 92.00% (manufacturing) and 93.39% (service) accuracy – substantially outperforming XGBoost and SVM (85–90%). Key manufacturing risk indicators follow a “high tax-high volatility-high scrutiny” pattern, with tax burden rate (0.129 weight), profit fluctuation (0.100), and audit frequency (0.091) being most predictive. Service sector risks manifest as “volatility-declaration-tax burden” dynamics, where profit volatility (0.142) emerges as the strongest predictor. These findings both validate machine learning’s efficacy in tax analysis and equip regulators with intelligent risk management tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Lan Yang, 2025. "Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331715
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331715
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331715&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.