IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic and economic efficiencies of alternative breeding schemes for improvement of local breeds in low-input production systems: The case of the Farta sheep in Northwest Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Abiy Shenkut Abebe
  • Kefyalew Alemayehu
  • Solomon Gizaw

Abstract

Designing and implementing a sound breeding program is essential for sustainably improving livestock productivity. This study evaluated the efficiencies of three breeding schemes for sustainable genetic improvement of indigenous sheep in low-input production systems. The schemes were one-stage selection at six months (Scheme I) or yearling age (Scheme II) and two-stage selections with the first at six months and the second at the yearling age (Scheme III). Each scheme was assessed with three levels of selection proportions (5%, 10% and 20%) and four flock sizes (600, 1200, 1800 and 2400 breeding ewes). Selection responses were simulated using a deterministic approach employed in the SelAction software. For six-month weight, the annual predicted genetic gains ranged from 0.177 to 0.267 kg (Scheme I) and 0.157 to 0.233 kg (Scheme III). For yearling weight, simulated annual genetic gains were 0.268 to 0.399 kg (Scheme II) and 0.265 to 0.398 kg (Scheme III). The expected annual genetic gains for the number of lambs weaned per ewe bred (NLW) and fertility rate were generally small, but the estimates in Schemes II and III were higher compared to Scheme I. The annual economic responses estimated for Schemes I, II, and III ranged from US$0.393 to 0.591, 0.589 to 0.879 and 0.494 to 0.744, respectively. Notably, Scheme II yielded 34% and 16% higher economic returns than Schemes I and III, respectively. The results also revealed that varying the selection proportion significantly influenced the annual selection response, index accuracy, and inbreeding rate. Increasing the flock size had little effect on the genetic progress but significantly reduced the inbreeding rate. Given its genetic and economic benefits alongside operational feasibility, Scheme II, with a 5% selection proportion and a flock size of 1200 breeding ewes, is appropriate for the genetic improvement of indigenous sheep in low-input systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Abiy Shenkut Abebe & Kefyalew Alemayehu & Solomon Gizaw, 2025. "Genetic and economic efficiencies of alternative breeding schemes for improvement of local breeds in low-input production systems: The case of the Farta sheep in Northwest Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331701
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331701
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331701&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.