IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditory and cognitive contributions to recognition of degraded speech in noise: Individual differences among older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Fogerty
  • Judy R Dubno

Abstract

This study examined individual differences in how older adults with normal hearing (ONH) or hearing impairment (OHI) allocate auditory and cognitive resources during speech recognition in noise at equal recognition. Associations between predictor variables and speech recognition were assessed across three datasets that each included 15–16 conditions involving temporally filtered speech. These datasets involved (1) degraded spectral cues, (2) competing speech-modulated noise, and (3) combined degraded spectral cues in speech-modulated noise. To minimize effects of audibility differences, speech was spectrally shaped according to each listener’s hearing thresholds. The extended Short-Time Objective Intelligibility metric was used to derive psychometric functions that relate the acoustic degradation to speech recognition. From these functions, speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were determined at 20%, 50%, and 80% recognition. A multiple regression dominance analysis, conducted separately for ONH and OHI groups, determined the relative importance of auditory and cognitive predictor variables to speech recognition. ONH participants had a stronger association of vocabulary knowledge with speech recognition, whereas OHI participants had a stronger association of speech glimpsing abilities with speech recognition. Combined with measures of working memory and hearing thresholds, these predictors accounted for 73% to 89% of the total variance for ONH and OHI, respectively, and generalized to other diverse measures of speech recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Fogerty & Judy R Dubno, 2025. "Auditory and cognitive contributions to recognition of degraded speech in noise: Individual differences among older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331487
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331487
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331487&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.