IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Osmolality as a strong predictor of COVID-19 mortality and its possible links to other biomarkers

Author

Listed:
  • Sirin Cetin
  • Ayse Ulgen
  • Hakan Sivgin
  • Meryem Cetin
  • Wentian Li

Abstract

Osmolality, concentration of solute particles, was rarely used for prognosis for COVID-19. By analyzing blood samples of more than 1300 COVID-19 patients from Tokat, Turkey (including 100 surviving and 30 deceased inpatients), we found calculated osmolality to be an excellent prognostic biomarker for mortality and significantly associated with hospitalization, independent from gender and age. Although calculated osmolality is defined as a weighted sum of sodium, glucose, and urea, the three are not necessarily independent. Other blood test biomarkers, ferritin, creatine, and chloride are also correlated with osmolality after conditioning on age. By applying a combination of collider analysis and mediation analysis, we design a pipeline to construct a causal model among all these variables in their relationship to osmolality. We confirm that while glucose and sodium are independent contributors of osmolality, glucose and urea, urea and sodium are correlated. We also conclude that ferritin and creatine are associated with osmolality through urea, and chloride’s association to osmolality is through sodium.

Suggested Citation

  • Sirin Cetin & Ayse Ulgen & Hakan Sivgin & Meryem Cetin & Wentian Li, 2025. "Osmolality as a strong predictor of COVID-19 mortality and its possible links to other biomarkers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331344
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331344
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331344&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.