IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331297.html

Rupture risk assessment for AComA aneurysms with morphological, hemodynamic and structural mechanical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jozsef Nagy
  • Nico Stroh-Holly
  • Wolfgang Fenz
  • Stefan Thumfart
  • Julia Maier
  • Zoltan Major
  • Harald Stefanits
  • Maria Gollwitzer
  • Johannes Oberndorfer
  • Vanessa Mazanec
  • Michael Giretzlehner
  • Michael Sonnberger
  • Philip Rauch
  • Andreas Gruber
  • Matthias Gmeiner

Abstract

Introduction: The Anterior Communicating Artery complex (AComA) is one of the most common intracranial aneurysms locations. Accurate rupture risk assessment in patients with cerebral aneurysms is essential for optimizing treatment decisions. Computational fluid dynamics has significantly advanced insight into aneurysmal hemodynamics. Many studies concentrate predominantly on blood flow patterns, frequently neglecting the biomechanical properties of the aneurysm wall. Fluid-structure interaction analysis combines hemodynamic behavior with wall mechanics, potentially facilitating a more thorough evaluation of rupture risk assessment. Methods: In this study, we employed advanced techniques to investigate several single and composite parameters to predict the rupture risk of AComA aneurysms in a cohort of 150 patients treated at the Kepler University Hospital in Linz, Austria. For this reason, clinical, morphological, hemodynamic, and structural mechanical parameters were assessed. Results: A subsequent workflow analysis, consisting of comparative analysis, collinearity analysis, predictive modeling, composite parameter, performance evaluation, and internal threshold validation, revealed the Gaussian curvature GLN (AUC = 0.91) with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.83 as a best-performing single parameter for aneurysm rupture prediction. Composite parameters like WGD (combination of wall shear stress, Gaussian curvature, and wall displacement) achieved an AUC of 0.89, and WG (combination of wall shear stress and Gaussian curvature) an AUC of 0.88. An internal validation with 25 independent ruptured aneurysms was performed, and the previous results were confirmed with very high sensitivity values of 0.92 for GLN. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the investigated morphological, hemodynamic, and structural, mechanical parameters could provide a potential tool for evaluating rupture risk for AComA aneurysms. The single morphological parameter GLN offers, followed by composite parameters WGD and WG, excellent prediction power for the aneurysm rupture state, as confirmed by internal validation. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the prospective clinical application of these parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Jozsef Nagy & Nico Stroh-Holly & Wolfgang Fenz & Stefan Thumfart & Julia Maier & Zoltan Major & Harald Stefanits & Maria Gollwitzer & Johannes Oberndorfer & Vanessa Mazanec & Michael Giretzlehner & Mi, 2025. "Rupture risk assessment for AComA aneurysms with morphological, hemodynamic and structural mechanical analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331297
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331297&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.