Author
Listed:
- Yang Liao
- Suhaily Mohd Hairon
- Najib Majdi Yaacob
- Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail
- Li Luo
Abstract
This study aimed to validate a culturally adapted Health Belief Model (HBM) questionnaire for assessing breast cancer screening beliefs among Chinese women and to evaluate its structural validity and measurement invariance. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 314 women aged 18–70 in Guizhou Province, China, using multistage sampling. The original HBM questionnaire underwent cultural adaptation and expert content review. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine the factor structure, and measurement invariance was tested across residential settings and age groups. A seven-factor solution was identified, encompassing all six core HBM constructs, with self-efficacy splitting into two empirically distinct dimensions. The final 41-item model demonstrated strong model fit (CFI = 0.914, TLI = 0.906, RMSEA = 0.059, SRMR = 0.060), high internal consistency (ω ≥ 0.88), and full invariance across subgroups. Convergent validity and inter-construct correlations aligned with theoretical expectations. In particular, strong positive associations were observed among self-efficacy, perceived benefits, and cues to action, while perceived barriers showed inverse relationships with perceived severity and risk perception. These findings offer empirical justification for both single-construct and multi-construct intervention strategies. The validated scale provides a psychometrically sound and culturally grounded tool for identifying psychological barriers to screening among Chinese women. It may guide the design of theory-informed public health interventions that address individual belief profiles and promote screening uptake.
Suggested Citation
Yang Liao & Suhaily Mohd Hairon & Najib Majdi Yaacob & Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail & Li Luo, 2025.
"Psychometric validation of a culturally adapted health belief model scale for breast cancer screening in Chinese women,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-20, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0331279
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331279
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.