IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning predictions of unplanned readmissions using electronic medical records: Predictor importance across medical and surgical patient populations

Author

Listed:
  • Michael M Havranek
  • Aljoscha B Hwang
  • Ilona Funke
  • Dominique Kuhlen
  • Daniel Liedtke
  • Stefan Boes

Abstract

Hospital readmissions prolong patient suffering and increase healthcare expenditures. While several studies have attempted to develop prediction models to reduce readmissions, most have demonstrated modest predictive accuracy. To improve upon prior approaches, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews to identify the most relevant predictor variables, then subsequently developed machine learning models in a retrospective, multisite study across eight hospitals. The patient sample comprised 200,799 inpatient stays from eligible hospitalizations, based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) definition of unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. We constructed random forest models and evaluated out-of-sample performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across different train–test splits. The hospital-wide sample was divided into medical and surgical cohorts to investigate predictor importance across different patient populations. The average AUC score was 0.78 ± 0.01 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Patients’ diagnoses were the most important predictor variables (contributing 18.4% ± 0.15 to the model’s decision, mean ± standard error [SE]), followed by nursing assessments (11.2% ± 0.04, mean ± SE) and procedural information (10.8% ± 0.09, mean ± SE). Comparing medical and surgical patients, we found that medications and prior healthcare use (e.g., prior emergency encounters) were more important in the medical compared with the surgical cohort, whereas procedural information and healthcare provider information (e.g., physician caseload) were more relevant in the surgical relative to the medical cohort. In conclusion, we have established the feasibility of using Swiss electronic medical record (EMR) data to accurately predict unplanned readmissions. The reported variable importances may guide future research and inform development of clinical decision support systems aimed at reducing readmissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael M Havranek & Aljoscha B Hwang & Ilona Funke & Dominique Kuhlen & Daniel Liedtke & Stefan Boes, 2025. "Machine learning predictions of unplanned readmissions using electronic medical records: Predictor importance across medical and surgical patient populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331263
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331263&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.