IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of the U.S. export controls against China on the resilience of Chinese corporates

Author

Listed:
  • Huan He
  • Peng Chen
  • Xianjing Huang
  • Le Li

Abstract

As Sino-US trade frictions intensify, the United States has continually strengthened its export control measures against China, posing potential risks to the international supply chains and production operations of Chinese enterprises. This paper has compiled data from the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Entity List and employed A-share manufacturing listed companies in China from 2015 to 2023 as research samples. By treating the U.S. export controls against China as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a multi-period difference-in-differences model to analyze the impact of these export controls on the resilience of Chinese manufacturing listed companies and the underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that U.S. export controls significantly reduce the resilience of affected firms within the industry in China, primarily by inhibiting internationalization processes, exacerbating financing environments, and intensifying corporate risks. Further analysis shows that firms with higher product market competitive advantages, greater analyst coverage, and more aggressive development strategies are better equipped to mitigate the shocks of export controls. Conversely, firms lacking political connections or operating in environments with higher external uncertainties are more susceptible to negative impacts, with their resilience significantly diminished. This study broadens the research scope of international trade policies and corporate resilience, offering insights for Chinese enterprises to enhance their adaptive capabilities and optimize business strategies in the complex and volatile international trade environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Huan He & Peng Chen & Xianjing Huang & Le Li, 2025. "The influence of the U.S. export controls against China on the resilience of Chinese corporates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331222
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331222&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Qing & Jia, Deting & Liu, Huiling & Wang, Kai, 2025. "Good for bad: The heterogeneous effects of export controls on firms' ESG," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Ina C. Jäkel & Søren Østervig & Erdal Yalcin, 2024. "The effects of heterogeneous sanctions on exporting firms: Evidence from Denmark," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 161-189, February.
    3. Glen Biglaiser & David Lektzian, 2020. "The effects of economic sanctions on targeted countries’ stock markets," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 526-550, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tibor Besedeš & Stefan Goldbach & Volker Nitsch, 2024. "Smart or smash? The effect of financial sanctions on trade in goods and services," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 223-251, February.
    2. Jerg Gutmann & Matthias Neuenkirch & Florian Neumeier, 2024. "Political Economy of International Sanctions," Research Papers in Economics 2024-07, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    3. Aytun, Uğur & Hinz, Julian & Özgüzel, Cem, 2025. "Shooting down trade: Firm-level effects of embargoes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Görg, Holger & Jacobs, Anna & Meuchelböck, Saskia, 2024. "Who is to suffer? Quantifying the impact of sanctions on German firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Jerg Gutmann & Matthias Neuenkirch & Florian Neumeier, 2024. "Do China and Russia undermine Western sanctions? Evidence from DiD and event study estimation," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 132-160, February.
    6. Liu, Xue-Ying & Zhao, Xin-Xin & Ma, Kun & Sharma, Susan Sunila, 2024. "The impact of financial sanctions on ESG performance of target countries," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Nicolas Gavoille, 2025. "A short drop or a sudden stop? Sanctions, trade shocks, and firms' adjustment margins," Working Papers 2025/03, Latvijas Banka.
    8. Wang, Siqin & Wen, Jun & Zhao, Xinxin & Zhou, Xiaozhou, 2025. "Impacts of international sanctions on sender countries’ innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1357-1373.
    9. Petrevski, Goran, 2025. "Economic sanctions and output growth: Empirical evidence," EconStor Preprints 325283, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Jun Wen & Xinxin Zhao & Chun‐Ping Chang, 2024. "The impact of international sanctions on innovation of target countries," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 39-79, March.
    11. Klose, Jens, 2024. "Empirical effects of sanctions and support measures on stock prices and exchange rates in the Russia–Ukraine war," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.