IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of graduate student emotional and cognitive processing of unexpected (chance) events

Author

Listed:
  • Hope Ferguson
  • Elisabeth E Schussler

Abstract

Research on graduate education often focuses on the expected challenges of graduate programs, such as proposal defenses, comprehensive exams, and mentoring relationships. However, less is known about how unexpected (chance) events may shape graduate student program experiences, including their impacts on career intentions. Prior research suggests that unexpected events introduce uncertainty and opportunities, however, the emotional and cognitive processes underlying these perceptions are unknown. This study explored how graduate students emotionally and cognitively processed a self-reported highly impactful chance event during their program. Specifically, this study asked 1) How did life science graduate students initially appraise and reappraise chance events? and 2) How did the narratives of chance event appraisals differ among participants who changed their career intentions versus those who did not? Using Appraisal Theory, we conducted thematic narrative analysis for the interviews with ten current life science graduate students. Five students had changed their career intentions since starting graduate school and five had not. These analyses revealed that themes of Initial Stressors, Initial Emotional Toll, and Growth were shared among participants, highlighting these as common processes related to unexpected events. However, the Help-Seeking, Self-Reliance, Realizations, and Resilience themes differed among those who had changed their career intentions or not. Those who had changed their career intentions often coped by using external support and prioritizing their mental well-being. Those who had not changed their career intentions coped via self-reliance, focusing on self-managing challenges and viewing chance events as opportunities to build new skill sets. This study demonstrated the utility of applying Appraisal Theory to graduate study, showcasing how appraisal and reappraisals of unexpected events may be related to career decision making. Implications include the need for effective coping strategies to navigate unexpected challenges and faculty and departmental support for career development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hope Ferguson & Elisabeth E Schussler, 2025. "A qualitative study of graduate student emotional and cognitive processing of unexpected (chance) events," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331182
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331182&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.