IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to effective network governance: A fuzzy-set QCA study of tripartite collaboration efficiency with Chinese official Weibo data

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanzhuo Wu
  • Yifen Xia

Abstract

In response to the insufficient research on multiagent collaboration mechanisms in existing network governance studies, this paper identifies the key influencing factors of the tripartite collaboration efficiency using the Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) method, and employs Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to reveal the collaborative pathways of multiple factors. The 2022 Government Affairs Index Weibo Influence Report issued by the Chinese government is used as the primary data source, selecting five dimensions: platform support, public participation, service level, response capacity, and social influence. Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) is then applied to verify the correlation between these five dimensions and the tripartite collaboration efficiency in government-platform-public interaction. The study finds that: (1) A positive social influence is a necessary condition for achieving high efficiency tripartite collaboration. A lack of interaction with netizens will result in low efficiency in government management of online public opinion. (2) If the government maintains proactive response capabilities, engages in high interaction with stakeholders such as netizens and the media, and improves the service level of both software and hardware in cyberspace, this represents the optimal combination pathway for enhancing tripartite collaboration efficiency. (3) If the government fails to focus on public satisfaction and social influence, even if local governments increase investments in software and hardware and improve service levels, effective management outcomes will not be achieved. This study’s innovation lies in the combined use of GRA and fsQCA to objectively identify the pathways for improving government-platform-public collaboration, providing scientific evidence for enhancing the efficiency of collaborative governance in online public opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanzhuo Wu & Yifen Xia, 2025. "Pathways to effective network governance: A fuzzy-set QCA study of tripartite collaboration efficiency with Chinese official Weibo data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331007
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331007&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.