Author
Listed:
- Abdullah A Alasmari
- Reshaa F Alruwaili
- Rasmiah F Alotaibi
- Ismail K Youssef
- Somia A Asklany
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly integrated into decision-making across various sectors, understanding public trust in these systems is more crucial than ever. This study presents a quantitative analysis of survey data from 335 participants to examine how demographic factors, age, gender, familiarity with AI, and frequency of technology use influence trust across a range of cognitive tasks. The findings reveal statistically significant relationships that vary by task type, with distinct patterns emerging in memory recall, complex problem-solving, and medical decision-making. Familiarity with AI and frequent use of technology are strong predictors of trust, suggesting that exposure and experience enhance confidence in AI capabilities. Conversely, age contributes significantly to disparities in responses, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare, where older participants exhibit greater skepticism. Gender-based differences are also observed, though less pronounced. These results underscore the importance of AI systems that are technically sound and sensitive to user diversity, advocating for personalized and context-aware trust-building strategies to support the ethical and effective integration of AI into human decision-making processes. The SEM model explained 43% of the variance in trust toward AI. Based on the findings, we recommend designing adaptive, user-centered AI systems and enhancing public education to reduce skepticism and increase familiarity.
Suggested Citation
Abdullah A Alasmari & Reshaa F Alruwaili & Rasmiah F Alotaibi & Ismail K Youssef & Somia A Asklany, 2025.
"Demographic influences on trust in artificial intelligence across cognitive domains: A statistical perspective,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-21, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0331003
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331003
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.