IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol for a scoping review of time to treatment in adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew R LeBlanc
  • Allison O Taylor
  • Osborn Owusu Ansah
  • Jamie Conklin

Abstract

Background: Delays in cancer treatment can result in tumor growth, increased clonal heterogeneity, upstaging, increased symptoms, organ damage, increased psychological distress, and worse clinical outcomes. Evidence supported guidelines for treatment timeliness exist in many cancers, but not for multiple myeloma (MM) though there is reason to believe delays in treatment would be detrimental. Aims: This scoping review aims to explore what is known about the impacts of the time from diagnosis to treatment among patients with MM. Methods: Our review will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Our search strategy was developed to identify sources published in or after the year 2000 related to time to treatment for adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Embase. Sources will be screened by two independent reviewers after exclusion/inclusion criteria are pilot tested and refined. A data extraction form was developed and will be refined by the study team for use during the scoping review. Discussion: This review will summarize the landscape of research related to time to treatment among newly diagnosed adults with multiple myeloma. Raising awareness of the available evidence on this topic, within the MM clinical and research community, will guide future research to address identified knowledge gaps. Registration: This protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (OSF) on the 25th of March, 2025 and can be found at osf.io/sydqw.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew R LeBlanc & Allison O Taylor & Osborn Owusu Ansah & Jamie Conklin, 2025. "Protocol for a scoping review of time to treatment in adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-5, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330907
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330907
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330907&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.