IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The spatiotemporal differentiation and influencing factors of urban vitality in the border areas of China

Author

Listed:
  • Fengwei Ai
  • Qingshan Yang

Abstract

Based on the concept of urban vitality and the unique geographical location of border areas, an evaluation framework for urban vitality in border areas was constructed from four dimensions: economy, society, openness, and culture. The entropy weight method was used to calculate the urban vitality levels of 45 border cities in 2000, 2010, 2019, and 2022, and the influencing factors were quantitatively analyzed. The results indicated that from 2000–2022, the vitality level of China’s border cities continued to rise, from 1.38 to 6.57 with an average annual growth rate of 7.35%. The southwestern border region exhibited the highest growth rate, which was 5.3 times greater than that of the western border region with the slowest growth. Spatially, the areas with high urban vitality shifted from the northeast area to the southwest area, with key vitality centers emerging in Mudanjiang (northeast), Baotou (north), Bortala Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture (northwest), and Chongzuo (southwest). Among the influencing factors, openness vitality was found as the primary internal constraint on urban vitality, while border policies and innovation capabilities were identified as the most significant external drivers. This research aims to provide both theoretical insights and empirical evidence to guide the enhancement of border city vitality, contributing to the broader global discourse on border region development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengwei Ai & Qingshan Yang, 2025. "The spatiotemporal differentiation and influencing factors of urban vitality in the border areas of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330856
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330856
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330856&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.