IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of mass spectrometry and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of plasma samples in identification of patients with fracture-related infections

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Malek
  • Roman M Natoli
  • Bartek Rajwa

Abstract

Objectives: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) have significant impact on patient outcomes. Diagnosing FRIs is challenging due to lack of robust, minimally invasive diagnostic tests in the early stages of the disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of proteomic mass spectrometry (MS) (quantitative approach) and spectral pattern analysis based on fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of plasma samples (qualitative approach) in discriminating between FRI and controls. Materials and methods: A prospective case-control study at a level 1 trauma center was conducted. Patients meeting confirmatory FRI criteria were matched with controls without infection based on age, time after surgery, and fracture region. Plasma samples were collected at the time of presentation for FRI and saved for batch analysis. Tandem mass tag liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for proteomics, and FTIR spectroscopy of dried films was used to obtain mid-infrared spectra from samples. Mid-infrared spectra were preprocessed, and for MS data, protein abundance ratios of FRI and controls were compared. Multivariate analysis-based predictive models were developed separately for FTIR-based spectra and MS-based protein ratio data. Results: Thirteen FRI and 13 controls were included in the study. The predictive models based on FTIR spectroscopy data had an average area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of ≈0.803, CI95(0.8, 0.81), the average sensitivity was ≈ 0. 0.755, CI95(0.75, 0.76), and the specificity was ≈ 0.677, CI95(0.672, 0.682). The MS-based predictive models from protein abundance ratio results had an average AUROC of ≈0.735, CI95(0.732, 0.737), the average sensitivity was ≈ 0.74, CI95 (0.739, 0.747), and the specificity was ≈ 0.653, CI95(0.649, 0.656). Discussion and conclusions: Mass spectrometry and spectral pattern recognition based on FTIR spectroscopy can both be used to develop predictive models that can discriminate between FRI and control samples. There is potential for both analytical approaches as candidate diagnostic biomarkers in FRI patients that require further validation in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Malek & Roman M Natoli & Bartek Rajwa, 2025. "Comparison of mass spectrometry and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of plasma samples in identification of patients with fracture-related infections," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330743
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330743
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330743&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariano Barrés-Carsí & Jorge Navarrete-Dualde & Javier Quintana Plaza & Elena Escalona & Christian Muehlendyck & Thibaut Galvain & José Baeza & Antonio Balfagón, 2022. "Healthcare resource use and costs related to surgical infections of tibial fractures in a Spanish cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.