IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinematical error analysis and autonomous calibration of a 5PUS-RPUR parallel robot

Author

Listed:
  • Zesheng Wang
  • Yanbiao Li
  • Bo Chen
  • Kexin Ding
  • Jialong Zhu
  • Min Zhuang

Abstract

Kinematic calibration is essential for improving the absolute accuracy of parallel robots, but conventional identification methods often struggle with the complex, non-linear coupling of their numerous geometric error parameters. This can lead to convergence to local rather than global optima, limiting the effectiveness of the calibration. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a novel self-calibration methodology based on a global optimization strategy. Taking the 5PUS-RPUR parallel robot as an example, its inverse kinematics is established based on screw theory. A sensitivity analysis is performed using the finite difference method to screen for and eliminate error sources with a negligible impact on the moving platform’s pose. Measurement points are then selected uniformly throughout the workspace using the farthest point sampling algorithm. An objective function for the GA is constructed by integrating the actuator displacement errors from each kinematic chain with the overall pose error of the moving platform. Non-linear constraints are handled using a penalty function approach. Based on measurement data from an onboard IMU and joint encoders, the identification results are obtained. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves the robot’s positional accuracy across its entire workspace. The superiority and efficacy of this approach are further corroborated by a benchmark comparison with three recent, state-of-the-art calibration methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zesheng Wang & Yanbiao Li & Bo Chen & Kexin Ding & Jialong Zhu & Min Zhuang, 2025. "Kinematical error analysis and autonomous calibration of a 5PUS-RPUR parallel robot," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330675
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330675
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330675&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.