IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Magnitude, distribution and determinants of non-utilization of antenatal care services among women in low- and middle-income countries: Insights for implementation of WHO recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Tadesse Tarik Tamir
  • Deresse Abebe Gebrehana
  • Alebachew Ferede Zegeye
  • Bewuketu Terefe
  • Berhan Tekeba

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy is a pivotal stage that fosters health and prepares women and their families for the transition to parenthood. Antenatal care (ANC) encompasses the services provided by skilled healthcare professionals to pregnant women and adolescent girls, ensuring optimal health outcomes for both mother and child throughout pregnancy. The majority of maternal and child deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to essential healthcare services, including ANC, remains a significant challenge. This study was aimed to assess the magnitude, spatial distribution, and determinants of non-utilization of ANC services in LMICs. Methods: This study analyzed data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2015 and 2024, encompassing a total of 47 LMICs. The analysis included a weighted sample of 480,068 women. We employed spatial analysis to illustrate the geographic distribution of non-utilization of antenatal care and hierarchical analysis to identify contributing factors. ArcGIS 10.8 and Stata 17 were utilized for spatial and hierarchical analysis, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and factors were considered statistically significant at a p-value of less than 0.05. Results: Pooled magnitude of non-utilization of ANC among women in LMICs was at 10.59%, ranging from 40.05% in Afghanistan to 0.76% in Burundi, with many regions in several countries identified as hotspots for ANC non-utilization. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of non-utilization included having no (AOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 3.02–3.55) or low (primary schooling: AOR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.67–1.96, and secondary schooling: AOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.18–1.38) education, being unmarried (AOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.29–1.41), lower wealth index (poorest: AOR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.77–1.98), poorer: AOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.38–1.54, middle: AOR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.11–1.24, and richer: AOR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04–1.15), having no media exposure (AOR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.64–1.73), residing in rural areas (AOR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02–1.09), facing distance issues to health facilities (AOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.28–1.34), and the low-income level of the countries (AOR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.23–6.74). Conclusion: A significant proportion of women in LMICs have not utilized antenatal care services. Factors at the individual, community, and country levels contribute to this non-utilization. Policymakers should focus on addressing these barriers to achieve the WHO recommendation of eight or more ANC contacts in LMICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadesse Tarik Tamir & Deresse Abebe Gebrehana & Alebachew Ferede Zegeye & Bewuketu Terefe & Berhan Tekeba, 2025. "Magnitude, distribution and determinants of non-utilization of antenatal care services among women in low- and middle-income countries: Insights for implementation of WHO recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330596
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330596
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330596&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.