IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of glaucoma in Africa: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Randy Asiamah
  • Samuel Kyei
  • Gideon Owusu
  • Patrick Evans Agyiri

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to establish the prevalence of glaucoma and the associated factors in Africa. Methods: A systematic review of studies reporting the prevalence of glaucoma was performed using three electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data were extracted and study-specific estimates of the prevalence of glaucoma were combined using meta-analysis to obtain pooled proportions. Results: A total of 9 studies that evaluated the prevalence of glaucoma in 29,606 individuals, comprising 14,487 males and 15,119 females were included in this study. The prevalence of glaucoma (unclassified glaucoma) in Africa was found to be 5.59% (95% Credible Interval (CrI) 4.32% to 7.74%). The prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG), Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma (PACG), and secondary glaucoma (SG) in Africa are 5.07% (95% (CrI) 3.51% to 8.52%), 0.98% (95% CrI 0.29% to 5.38%), and 2.19% (95% CrI 0.64% to 10.00%), respectively. The prevalence of glaucoma is highest in Southern Africa (6.47%, 95% CrI 3.10% to 12.10%) and lowest in East Africa (4.80%, 95% CrI 2.37% to 9.27%). The prevalence of POAG is highest in West Africa (6.48% 95% CrI 5.23% to 9.89%) and lowest in East Africa (3.23% 95% CrI 2.21% to 5.07%). Conclusion: The prevalence rates of glaucoma and POAG are high, with geographical regional variations worthy of note. Continued efforts are necessary to implement population-based screening and public health education initiatives to foster early diagnosis and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Randy Asiamah & Samuel Kyei & Gideon Owusu & Patrick Evans Agyiri, 2025. "Prevalence of glaucoma in Africa: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330567
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330567&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.