IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to improve mental health of hospital workers: The SEEGEN multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Nadine Mulfinger
  • Marc N Jarczok
  • Andreas Müller
  • Melanie Genrich-Hasken
  • Britta Worringer
  • Janna Katharina Küllenberg
  • Florian Junne
  • Felicitas Rapp
  • Monika A Rieger
  • Eva Rothermund-Nassir
  • Ute Ziegenhain
  • Nicole R Hander
  • Imad Maatouk
  • Madeleine Helaß
  • Martin Peters
  • Anja Sander
  • Regina Krisam
  • Ronald Limprecht
  • Elena Gesang
  • Sascha A Ruhle
  • Stefan Süß
  • Bernd Puschner
  • Peter Angerer
  • Harald Gündel

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital workers are at high risk for stress-related mental health issues and are considered a vulnerable workforce in most Western countries. Although multilevel interventions that address individual and organizational factors show promise, there is limited robust evidence of their effectiveness in hospital settings. This study evaluated the SEEGEN trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in the German healthcare sector, to assess the effectiveness of a structured multilevel intervention designed to reduce psychosocial stress and to promote mental well-being among hospital employees. The intervention included five modules that targeted different hierarchical levels, sources of interpersonal and structural stress, and potentially vulnerable life stages. These modules were: (i) top management training, (ii) dilemma management – coping by taking responsibility, (iii) promoting stress-preventive relational leadership competence, (iv) reconciling work and family life, and (v) staying healthy at work. Methods: The study was conducted at three clinical centers in Germany and included 18 clusters with a total of N = 415 participants. The clusters were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was psychological strain (Irritation Scale; IRR), and the secondary outcomes were mental well-being (WHO-5) and perceived psychosocial safety climate, (PSC-12). Intervention effects were estimated using a two-level linear analysis of covariance. Changes from baseline to the 11-month follow-up were analyzed. Results: The intervention had no statistically significant effect on the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The lack of significant effects may be attributed to low participation rates, an insufficient intervention dosage, and contextual factors, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and staffing shortages in the participating hospitals. Although the intervention cannot currently be recommended for widespread implementation, the study provides valuable insights into developing, delivering, and overcoming the challenges of multilevel workplace interventions in healthcare settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadine Mulfinger & Marc N Jarczok & Andreas Müller & Melanie Genrich-Hasken & Britta Worringer & Janna Katharina Küllenberg & Florian Junne & Felicitas Rapp & Monika A Rieger & Eva Rothermund-Nassir &, 2025. "Effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to improve mental health of hospital workers: The SEEGEN multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330490
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330490&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.