IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of access to insecticide-treated nets in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel cross-country analysis using 29 DHS data

Author

Listed:
  • Jember Azanaw
  • Eshetu Abera Worede

Abstract

Background: Having access to Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITNs) is crucial for avoiding malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where the disease burden is disproportionately high. Despite their efficacy, socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic factors continue to cause notable differences in ITN access within and between nations. By employing a multilevel analysis of data from 29 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) throughout SSA, this study seeks to fill knowledge gaps about the factors that influence access at the individual and community levels. Methods: The study utilized data from 29 DHS surveys in SSA, which encompassed 214,181 households. Factors affecting access to ITN at the individual and community levels were examined using multilevel logistic regression models. Household head characteristics (sex, marital status, education, wealth index, television access, and family size) were among the individual-level factors. On the other hand, community-level characteristics included geography, kind of home, poverty, media exposure, and education. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and deviance were used to evaluate the model’s fitness. Measures of variation, including the Median Odds Ratio (MOR), Proportional Change in Variance (PCV), and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), were used to assess the effects at the community level. Results: ITNs were reported by just 32.11% of households, with notable differences across socioeconomic classes and geographical areas. Higher ITN access was substantially correlated with married household heads, wealthier families, larger family sizes, and higher educational attainment. Access was also greatly enhanced by community-level factors such as urban residency, media exposure, and higher education. The best fit was Model 3, which explained 15.24% of the variance in ITN access by combining characteristics at the person and community levels. There were clear regional differences, with West Africa having higher probabilities of access than East Africa (AOR = 4.48). Conclusion: The study highlights the multifaceted determinants of ITN access in SSA, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions addressing both individual and community-level barriers. Strengthening distribution networks, increasing funding for subsidized ITN programs and enhancing public health education is essential for achieving universal coverage and reducing the malaria burden in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Jember Azanaw & Eshetu Abera Worede, 2025. "Determinants of access to insecticide-treated nets in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel cross-country analysis using 29 DHS data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330431
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330431&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.