IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing students’ self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling: Associations with learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Alenius
  • Marie Rask
  • Albert Westergren
  • Petra Nilsson Lindström
  • Marie Nilsson
  • Lina Behm

Abstract

Several non-communicable diseases are strongly linked to lifestyle factors, making preventive measures essential. One effective approach is lifestyle counselling, which has demonstrated promising results in the prevention, treatment, and management of these diseases. However, despite its potential, patients often do not receive lifestyle counselling to the extent required. The existing literature indicates that one contributing factor is low self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling among nurses. This study aimed to explore nursing students’ self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling and its association with self-assessed learning methods. Nursing students (n = 310) completed a questionnaire that had a cross-sectional study design at a university in southern Sweden. The self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling scale (SELC20 + 20) was used to measure self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling, and additional questions about learning methods were included to assess Bandura’s sources of self-efficacy. Multiple linear regression was used to explore the relationship between self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling and self-assessed learning methods. The mean total knowledge score was significantly higher than that of the mean total ability score. The learning methods that were significantly associated with self-efficacy in knowledge of lifestyle counselling after adjustment for age and sex, were: own search for knowledge, theoretical knowledge through education, receiving feedback on counselling, personal experiences, observed lifestyle counselling, and experience in lifestyle counselling (R2 = 0.30). Learning methods that were significantly associated with self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling ability, after adjusting for age and sex, were: own search for knowledge, personal experiences, theoretical knowledge through education, and receiving feedback on counselling (R2 = 0.33). The results indicated that mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, and social persuasion were significantly associated with knowledge of lifestyle counselling, while mastery experiences and social persuasion were significantly associated with lifestyle counselling ability. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of how self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling develops among nursing students.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Alenius & Marie Rask & Albert Westergren & Petra Nilsson Lindström & Marie Nilsson & Lina Behm, 2025. "Nursing students’ self-efficacy in lifestyle counselling: Associations with learning methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330369
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330369&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.